![]() ![]() ![]() |
We shall use the following rest frame spectrum for the decay
(1)
where
This is the form of the spectrum for
, with
(and also for
with
,
and a
coupling). It is somewhat more sharply peaked than 3-body phase space and might work reasonably well for multibody states with the invariant mass
held fixed in the spirit of an isobar model (e.g. it is a reasonable approximation to the spectrum expected in
for
[7,8]; possible spectra are discussed further in refs. [3, 7--9].
will be kept as a free parameter here.
We assume throughout that the transverse momentum in the fragmentation
is negligible, as must be the case in the fragmentation of non-strange quarks
if this picture is to describe correctly the jets observed at SPEAR [10] (we expect that
and so neglect of
should be a good first approximation). Further we assume that the probability of finding
in the range
to
is a function
of
. (2) Some previous authors have assumed a
singularity in
as
[9,11,12]. We believe that such a term should have a negligibly small coefficient since it represents the associated production of
pairs in the central plateau of rapidity (
) with an implied charmed particle multiplicity growing like
. In models with short-range order this processes should be independent of the flavor of the fragmenting quark; the evident paucity of charmed particle production in pp collisions then suggests that it is negligible. In any case consistency demands that we neglect it since we have neglected associated production in events in which non-charmed quarks are produced at the primary photon vertex. With one D per c the function
must be normalized to one
We adopt the ansatz
where we expect
or 2 from theoretical considerations. We will investigate the sensitivity to variations in
. At asymptotic energies we should clearly put
(in the c.m. system) and we expect that
as
where inclusive production turns into exclusive
production (suggesting
for a smooth exclusive-inclusive connection [13] with monopole form factors and
from more detailed theoretical considerations [14]). We favor
which appears to be supported by data on inclusive hadron production at large momenta at SPEAR [15].
If we wish to extend the model to subasymptotic energies we are then forced to put
so that with
,
always corresponds to the exclusive processes and the vanishing of
in this limit make sense. (With other prescriptions there is the danger of excluding
and violating the normalization condition.) The model then correctly yields D meson production at rest at threshold and is, we believe, likely to work reasonably well in an average sense at all energies. In our view the
production cross section will interpolate smoothly through any s-channel structure in
down to low energies (though it does not have the threshold behavior of
). Thus we assume
taking
for the charmed quark and including a factor 3 for color (in fact we are primarily interested in spectra in which multiplicative functions of
play no role but we wish to include our best guess for completeness; obviously this formula and our ansatz for
are subject to direct verification if
is measured via hadronic decays). For lepton production
where
and the quark-to-lepton fragmentation function
is given by
with
The
integral is easy to do analytically with
our
choice of
but we have done the
integral numerically except in the
limit where we obtain
The units are such that
and
with
.
is the dilogarithm function as defined in ref. [16], where tables of its values may be found. With
, this formula reduces to the simple (but probably misleading) form
which may be useful for exploratory purposes.