Stephen Wolframstephenwolfram.com
Publications by Stephen Wolfram * Articles * Particle Physics * Lepton Energy Spectra in e+ e- Annihilation and Other Processes (1977)
LEPTON ENERGY SPECTRA IN e+ e- ANNIHILATION AND OTHER PROCESSES (1977)


2. Decay and fragmentation functions

We shall use the following rest frame spectrum for the decay (1)

where

This is the form of the spectrum for , with (and also for with , and a coupling). It is somewhat more sharply peaked than 3-body phase space and might work reasonably well for multibody states with the invariant mass held fixed in the spirit of an isobar model (e.g. it is a reasonable approximation to the spectrum expected in for [7,8]; possible spectra are discussed further in refs. [3, 7--9]. will be kept as a free parameter here.

We assume throughout that the transverse momentum in the fragmentation is negligible, as must be the case in the fragmentation of non-strange quarks if this picture is to describe correctly the jets observed at SPEAR [10] (we expect that and so neglect of should be a good first approximation). Further we assume that the probability of finding in the range to is a function of . (2) Some previous authors have assumed a singularity in as [9,11,12]. We believe that such a term should have a negligibly small coefficient since it represents the associated production of pairs in the central plateau of rapidity () with an implied charmed particle multiplicity growing like . In models with short-range order this processes should be independent of the flavor of the fragmenting quark; the evident paucity of charmed particle production in pp collisions then suggests that it is negligible. In any case consistency demands that we neglect it since we have neglected associated production in events in which non-charmed quarks are produced at the primary photon vertex. With one D per c the function must be normalized to one

We adopt the ansatz

where we expect or 2 from theoretical considerations. We will investigate the sensitivity to variations in . At asymptotic energies we should clearly put (in the c.m. system) and we expect that as where inclusive production turns into exclusive production (suggesting for a smooth exclusive-inclusive connection [13] with monopole form factors and from more detailed theoretical considerations [14]). We favor which appears to be supported by data on inclusive hadron production at large momenta at SPEAR [15].

If we wish to extend the model to subasymptotic energies we are then forced to put so that with , always corresponds to the exclusive processes and the vanishing of in this limit make sense. (With other prescriptions there is the danger of excluding and violating the normalization condition.) The model then correctly yields D meson production at rest at threshold and is, we believe, likely to work reasonably well in an average sense at all energies. In our view the production cross section will interpolate smoothly through any s-channel structure in down to low energies (though it does not have the threshold behavior of ). Thus we assume

taking for the charmed quark and including a factor 3 for color (in fact we are primarily interested in spectra in which multiplicative functions of play no role but we wish to include our best guess for completeness; obviously this formula and our ansatz for are subject to direct verification if is measured via hadronic decays). For lepton production

where

and the quark-to-lepton fragmentation function is given by

with

The integral is easy to do analytically with our choice of but we have done the integral numerically except in the limit where we obtain

The units are such that and with . is the dilogarithm function as defined in ref. [16], where tables of its values may be found. With , this formula reduces to the simple (but probably misleading) form

which may be useful for exploratory purposes.

previous  l   next