![]() ![]() ![]() |
It is necessary to resort to numerical techniques to make a complete investigation of the positivity of distributions for
. As an example, we consider first the following simple parametrization of the starting distributions for the case of four flavours:

We take

but will allow
and
to vary. The moments of these
are given by

where
is the Beta function.
We consider the
and
generated from the starting distributions of eq. (12) at
, which corresponds to
for
and
. We know that these quantities are positive for
(see figs. 1 and 2) but they become negative for large
unless
and
satisfy eq. (3). Table 1 gives the minimum
(which we call
) at which this occurs for various
and
. The contributions of higher-twist operators probably invalidate the use of the asymptotic freedom formulae for
(
), or
in this case. We can therefore only exclude values of
and
which give
. The outlined central area in table 1 (in which
) corresponds to the allowed values of
and
; it is considerably larger than the region allowed by the
bound of eq. (3) but has similar features. For
, it is
which becomes negative for
while for
it is
.
In this case, it turns out that the
positivity constraints are at least as strong as the
ones for a given
. If we consider values of
larger than 1.2, the maximum allowed value of
tends to grow very slowly with
, and the
constraints begin to become stricter than the
ones for small
and
(although this never happens in a region which is not seriously hampered by higher-twist effects). An increase (decrease) of
increases (decreases)
throughout the domain in which
becomes negative for
(this domain, which was originally
is itself decreased (increased)). Likewise, an increase (decrease) of
increases (decreases)
in the region where
becomes negative.
0f course, actual quark and gluon momentum distributions will not be of the simple form (12). Some idea of the results of using more complicated forms may be obtained by admixing a small
component into the
and
of eq. (12). Very small contamination of
is sufficient to prevent it from becoming negative for values of
and
at which asymptotic freedom formulae should apply (ignoring higher-twist operators). It would also, however, ruin the agreement between theory and experiment for the Drell-Yan process. On the other hand, even 10% admixtures into
(changing it drastically for large
) do not appreciably change the point at which it becomes negative (although for small
this occurs at larger
.

for which the moment of one of the momentum distributions becomes negative at
starting from distributions at
(with
). The starting gluon and
antiquark momentum distributions are taken to behave like
and
, respectively (and the valence quark distributions like
). The lines enclose the region in which
where the higher-twist operations are important.
If we use the phenomenological fits of Field and Feynman [6] or Barger and
Phillips [7] as the starting quark distributions, then we find that positivity is only respected for
a small distance below
if
falls less rapidly with
than about
. Steeper starting gluon distributions (e.g. [8]) should therefore probably be abandoned.